Wiltshire Crop Circle Speaks

This blog is designed to provide the reader with a fairly simplified means of understanding the fundamental communication intended by any advanced intelligence behind the development of the pattern. The primary contribution is the use of “dimensionless ratios” which can often lead to even the design units of measure.

The image below is just a portion of the overall analysis, but is provided for the introduction of the important concepts.  This procedure is ridiculously simple and it is stunning that more folks have not discovered it. Advanced civilizations have been screaming their heads off and we have been asleep.

The most important observation for easy resolution in this case is that the image is quite perpendicular (directly overhead) so the complications of camera distortion are a minimum. The second important observation is that the three-point circle option in Autosketch fits two red circles to the image quite precisely around the entire circumference. The resulting radii for each circle are easily repeatable to at least four digits for a novice CAD operator.

The parallel black lines sloping downhill from top right to bottom left are harvesting equipment tracks thought to be about 9 feet in overall width to fit on the UK highways under normal wide load equipment restrictions of 2.9 meters. Likely, the harvester design for the outside of the wheels is slightly shorter than the 9.5 feet overall width which would allows the harvester to be loaded on to a trailer slightly wider than the wheels.

The use of 9 feet actual outside wheel width in conjunction with the large red circle radius makes the overall true radius about 49.2 feet. That would make the area 49.2 squared times pi = 7602.6 square feet or about 0.17453 acres. (pi / 180 = 0.0174533 is used to convert between degrees and radians) It is not likely hoaxers are smart enough to make that calculation, don’t you think?  😊

It appears the creation of the pattern distorted the tracks near the center of the pattern which means the harvest tracks were already there when the pattern was created with the remaining stems. The harvester simply cannot make the tracks the way they are distorted. And in one area, the tracks are distorted further than possible if the stems were pushed over by humans.  It appears some of the stems have been lifted and then laid back down 2 or more feet from their original location. Whatever force that did it, was operating counterclockwise.

Both wheat and barley are common crops in Wiltshire and both typically grow around 4 feet and only the top 6-8 inches are harvested leaving the stems at least 2 feet in height.

In the text insert to the right in the top line one can see that the inverse conjugate ratio of the large red circle with the smaller inside red circle is {[((3.882523 – 1.7664268) / (3.882523 + 1.7664268) x 8 x 5]^^(1/5) * 1.2 } ^^(1/2) * 144 = 206.7835008. Taking the fifth root then multiplied by 1.2 and then taking the square root x 144 is all part of the Newgrange Procedure and not some random set of operations. Multiplying 8 x 5 is the same as doubling two times as we would in octaves, and Egyptians did routinely, and then decimal shifting by 10. The Newgrange Procedure is covered in detail in www.newgrange-geometry-portals.blogspot.com and involves the study of magnetic portals between earth and sun and recently being developed at an Iowa university. While the development of the procedure is complex, the overall blog is not.

For the non-technical reader, one can see in the next portion of the text in the above image, the same number is developed (underlined in blue) using the simple ratio of the smaller / larger red circle dimensionless ratio. Again, this uses the Newgrange Procedure and the results are really close to each other.

But here is the real issue for the non-technical reader.  This number sequence developed, 206.7835xxxx is exceptionally close to 206.7833848 w/o zeros for the magnetic flux quantum. This number is used in high level physics studies of superconducting arrangements studying the effects of extreme magnetic fields.

Obviously, most readers will not have a clue what the magnetic flux quantum is about. But you don’t need to know that to understand that any intelligence that is going to try and enhance our understanding of the universe is going to need to use steps we may not yet fully understand. All of these topics are covered pretty well in Wikipedia articles.

So, one might ask, “Why train us in this outlandish obtuse methodology? Why not just come out and spill your guts on the Whitehouse lawn?” There is this fundamental rule mentioned in Star Trek about “non-direct-intervention” and in reality, it is not just the rule any galactic government made up, but is fundamental to the way any useable human understanding must develop.

In the small cyan colored triangle development in the text, one can see the focus on the speed of light in multiple developments and then the final support as the conversion from British to Metric units. This technique is used in huge ancient structures around our world constructed in really distant history and covered by dozens of my blogs.

This phase of the blog leaves it here for the non-technical folks whose patience has maybe worn thin.  The next phase will be a little more mathematically complicated.

Wiltshire Diagonals

One can see in the image below that green diagonals can be drawn between straight edges on one side of the gap between red circles where triangular features are located. Even though the triangular features are different, there is always a straight edge of some kind on the opposite side. And while the diagonal passes near the centers of the red circles, they are definitely at least slightly off center but near each other.

The effort was started near vertical and the plot of these angles in Excel aroused the obvious observation that there is a total of 16 lines, but only eight different ones.  This is because the intersection of two straight lines produces angles each side of the intersection as exact equals. The plot of the 16 angles produced some interesting features but nothing that easy to resolve. Note there are two lines connecting 5 angles and one line connecting 4 and 3 angles.

When just the eight angles starting with the largest one was plotted below, the grouping of three made it obvious what the communicative plan was. Fortunately for me, this is something I have seen in other decoding of ancient huge structures like Teotihuacan.

In spite of having only 8 angles to work with, one can see there are 4 groups of three that easily link together with relatively simple algebraic equations. One can easily ascertain that this is a very consistent overall design parameter and not just a random hit of a couple groups of three. Still, the mathematics to develop this pattern is beyond many of the engineers that have worked for me. Most people would have to resort to graphics to find the solution.

The graph above points to “simultaneous equations” about as clearly as can be done graphically. The good news for the casual reader is this could be pointing to simultaneous algebraic equations, normally taught in the Eighth Grade in most school curriculum. The bad news is it might be pointing towards simultaneous differential equations, normally taught in the final years of engineering curriculum. The shapes of the geometric figures around the zone between red circles sure looks like complex vector analysis, not seriously covered in top level engineering for BS degrees.

The slope of the green line is very near 0.0375 and the orange line 0.375, where 0.375 is 3/8 and 0.0375 is 3/80. These are not accidents. Two points determine a line.  If there is a third or more, they are created by some intelligence. This far beyond the abilities of most readers and even some college professors.

While the casual reader might wonder what in the heck could this be leading to, please remember you are trying to be taught something you have never even wondered about. And yet, so far it is just appealing to your curiosity and not needing you to know what the magnetic flux quantum is all about.

What you would be wise to learn is something that maybe takes a week in college physics or perhaps an advanced class in high school for a couple weeks. Nearly everything we know about the universe beyond earth comes to us in electromagnetic waves, primarily from hydrogen and helium. But you don’t need to know them all, just the two most abundant hydrogen and similarly the helium. For hydrogen, the base numerical stream is 1.215668 and 1.215674 and for helium 0.30378 and 0.303786.  It is the multiples or division by 2’s, as in musical octaves, that make these numbers a key for communication.

Analysis of Lower Left Vectors

In the three vector triangles, note the one in the middle in red is 100/phi exactly.  It was very close and so the ACAD lines were modified slightly to make it exact. Something else needs to happen to make this assumption sound reasonable.

The top angle in green is developed backwards from the magnetic flux quantum by the following formula:

          (206.7833848 / 144)^⁽²⁾ / 1.2 x 1024 / 1000 x 360 = 63.3472122 where 1024 is 2^⁽¹⁰⁾ to get the angle in special radians and finally multiplied by 360 to get degrees. Also, from the Newgrange Procedure, a numerical link is established between the basic electrical charge and phi. If you have been following the progress of NIST in their Codata results, you will see more and more constants are now defined exactly by their relationship to other constants and not to measured values.

Again, something else must happen to make this precise assumption more convincing.

In the bottom left again in green, this angle is precisely derived from the definition of the second of time established from the earth orbital period in the year 1900 AD at 31,556,925.9747 seconds. That assignment then made the speed of light exactly 299,792,458 meters per second. Before that, technical papers varied all over the place for the researcher’s use of their own time and speed.

          63.3472122 / 3.1556926^⁽⁴⁾ x 100 = 63.8776222

Now, I am a retired professional engineering manager and have been fluent at times with 5 different programming languages. It takes a fairly broad experience to discuss topics out of my specialty with people with Ph D training and yet still be able to convince usually an engineer at a multi-billion-dollar smelter that we can help with a good solution to reduce their costs of operation. It is not easy to change somebody’s mind who is already sure he knows everything. 😊

The computer analysis it would take to make these number sequences appear as they do would take a team of technical people at least months. None of these people would sacrifice their professional license and reputation stomping down crops. None of the hoaxers I have read about could even find the appropriate topics to study in mathematical text books.

The communication objective here is to 1) get your attention with the 100/phi angle; 2) pray you use the Newgrange Procedure to get the top green angle; 3) feel certain the bottom angle must have some communicative purpose…and keep looking until you find it. It might get far more complicated as other angles are attacked in this analysis.  How many hoaxers even know what phi is?

What could be more meaningful than associating the magnetic flux quantum with the analysis of time, or the Tempic Field referred to in my blog www.finding-our-inner-way.blogspot.com . These are all portions of the pursuit of the elements of a space-time portal covered in other blogs. If you are reading this online, you can click on profile and all the blogs are listed and accessible.

The entire zone of vectors has similar solutions and may be published at a later date. For now, if the reader is not convinced this pattern has a very important message, nothing is going to ever make it happen for you.

Jim Branson, Retired Professional Engineering Manager

emailàbransonjim9 at gmail dot com

This blog is hereby made a part of the public domain and can be used in any positive manner.